BIG WHEEL BICYCLE AND TAPE RECORDER

I took up some problems I left behind - and a bit unsolved, many years ago.  I was about st 3 - st 5.

BIG WHEEL BICYCLE AND TAPE
RECORDER
Big Wheel Bicycle and Tape Recorder - part 1
I take a cassette recorder, and a tape to put inside
Three objects can in various ways influence the following:
I want to see how many turns does the tape inside the tape player make; as to make full turn ;
how many full turns can be counted with the tape counter running -giving an amount of full turns
of the tape within a certain amount of numbers passing on the tape counter and a stop watch to
add the minutes or seconds to add to the information as to:
In x seconds the tape wheel turned y amount of times and the counter turned z amount of
numbers to get a set equation to describe: if I have the counter value z, then I can work out how
many times the tape wheel will turn in x amount of seconds.
Firstly will the speed of the turn of the tape wheel stay constant?
Secondly - the tape or cassette can have an influence as to the way the tape within the cassette
is rolled up: very tight or loose.
Thirdly: the counter is giving indications as to where on the counter will a new song start. Will it
always be correct? What about different counters?
Then I take this example to the following
I have a bicycle with two tyres that are the size on the tar surface more or less like the mountain
bikes.
The wheels are in diameter much smaller than the average bicycles find their wheels to be.
I also had a counter meter on this bicycle to determine the kilometres I have travelled - eg. from
our house to the school.

Big Wheel Bicycle and Tape Recorder - part 2

What I would like to determine would be:If the km counter count 5
meters, how many full turns have the wheel made in 5m?
Then, my friends bicycle had wheels a little bit larger than mine in
diameter and it was more thin on the tar surface than my Big Wheel.
How many times would her wheel turn with the same counter in 5m?
I was trying to explain to her but I had a case when she said we must challenge who will be first
at the stop street. My point was, my bicycle's wheels does not really lend it to be a speed bicycle
- and she thought it great fun, but we will challenge anyway as we both just have to peddle.
When I though take the time of my bicycle to complete say: 1km, for her bicycle to reach the
same time for that distance, what will she have to do?
Though, if she complete that distance and both the bicycles wheel cycles were measured as to
say x (mine) and y (hers) as to a distance of 5 meter, then the time to complete Ikm for the 2
bicycles : will differ?
Full turn of the wheel in 5m: x and y (2 different bicycles)
Now for lkm the amount of wheel turns : 1000/5x and 1000/5y.
This gives that there should be a proportioned difference in the times it would take both bicycles
to cover lkm.
Does this mean she will always win?
Or if I outrace her, did I defy some scientific law? Taking into account she won't qive up her
position to win.

Big Wheel Bicycle and Tape Recorder - part 3

The point where the whole challenge as to the size of the wheels influencing, would be
Now, none of the bicycles had gears.
When I peddle the Big Wheel, is there any limit in the amount of cycles that can be completed in
30 seconds?
So, this mean - I felt we had to get on a bicycle that could measure the amount of cycles (a) the
peddles make in say (b) minutes. Then we would be racing fair and square to see who did the
most peddles in a certain time.
Or, I take a stopwatch measure how long it takes her to cover a distance on Big Wheel and then
she times mine. Then we can also do it on her bicycle. Measure the stopwatch readings. Who
was fastest?

Big Wheel Bicycle and Tape Recorder - Overview (I) as to Chaos Theory - Sierpinski:

In the example of the bicycles: the determinant of the fastest or slowest, is not the 2 people,
even one person can do the test on the bicycle over and over and over. It is highly unlikely the
times to complete a certain distance would each time be exactly the same, to the milli second.
Even if this is done only once every third or fourth day for multiple times to get an indication.
Important is, I do not intend to average the data. To a certain degree, is it not possible if an
average is taken, and after a month you do it again, the whole test every third or fourth day for
multiple times, then you can get another average on the data which you
continue to do multiple times. But, is it not possible to say - even an average is data, so as to
gather "averages"-data as well and what would actually be the point to get an average on all the
"averages"-data? You will have more than enough data with all the
data it took to get to all the averages that gave the "averages"-data.
Will a fair and just chance exist to test the "winner" on the average that was gathered? So, the
whole idea of a live, action and fun filled concept, somehow, somewhere within the endless data
take of averages, became something else. Who is the winner if the average on all averages has
been determined. My take on the matter is - can such and so many data be taken as a
competitive action? As to compare it to the data of the other person.
I think that was why my friend was not interested in my solution as to the fairness of the
situation. How many years would it have taken us my way - where as she calls on a race when
we leave the schoolyard and when we get to the cafe, it is over. Or like the tennis we played -
she loved that too as I couldn't get my tennis racket when serving as to hit the ball. I missed it
and got so angry that the racket flew over the tennis court. This is it! I am finished playing tennis
with you for today. Although to her this was probably the funniest joke she ever heard. So, she
loved playing tennis
also. I did not.

Big Wheel Bicycle and Tape Recorder part 4

I remember though, I did consider different ways to rather compensate a solution. At some
stage, I really thought we would do good if we get me a horse. We could keep it in the backyard
and my parents see to the food and taking care of. I can go to school and my horse will outrun
my friend on her bicycle. My parents realized our yard was too small to keep a horse. Then I
saw a boat that was for sale. So, I gathered as many other options I could possibly lay my eyes
on as a different means of transport to and from school. A motor to the wheels of my bicycle
was also no solution. I think, I tried a few things out, I checked on the type of motors I had
available to check out, I couldn't make out the skylectric cars, their little engines, any way to
apply something similar to the bicycle.

As one day to the next .... And me on my photographs, like two weeks ago....

Two Systems - Second Law of Thermodynamics and a normal random system

Two Systems - Second Law of Thermodynamics and a normal random system


A  -  I quote : from web, Wikipedia on 15 November 2018

I   About Entropy  (this one though the Google short explanation on Entropy)

In thermodynamics, entropy is commonly associated with the amount of order, disorder, or chaos in a vthermodynamic system. ... Locally, the entropy can be lowered by external action. This applies to machines, such as a refrigerator, where the entropy in the cold chamber is being reduced, and to living organisms.

II    The Laws on Thermodynamics

Zeroth law of thermodynamics: If two systems are in thermal equilibrium with a third system, they are in thermal equilibrium with each other. This law helps define the concept of temperature.

First law of thermodynamics: When energy passes, as work, as heat, or with matter, into or out from a system, the system's internal energy changes in accord with the law of conservation of energy. Equivalently, perpetual motion machines of the first kind(machines that produce work with no energy input) are impossible.

Second law of thermodynamics: In a natural thermodynamic process, the sum of the entropies of the interacting thermodynamic systems increases. Equivalently, perpetual motion machines of the second kind (machines that spontaneously convert thermal energy into mechanical work) are impossible.

Third law of thermodynamics: The entropy of a system approaches a constant value as the temperature approaches absolute zero.[2] With the exception of non-crystalline solids (glasses) the entropy of a system at absolute zero is typically close to zero.


III    About Order and Disorder(Entropy)
The relationship between entropy, order, and disorder in the Boltzmann equation is so clear among physicists that according to the views of thermodynamic ecologists Sven Jorgensen and Yuri Svirezhev, “it is obvious that entropy is a measure of order or, most likely, disorder in the system.”[13] In this direction, the second law of thermodynamics, as famously enunciated by Rudolf Clausius in 1865, states that:

“The entropy of the universe tends to a maximum.”

Thus, if entropy is associated with disorder and if the entropy of the universe is headed towards maximal entropy, then many are often puzzled as to the nature of the "ordering" process and operation of evolution in relation to Clausius' most famous version of the second law, which states that the universe is headed towards maximal “disorder”. In the recent 2003 book SYNC – the Emerging Science of Spontaneous Order by Steven Strogatz, for example, we find “Scientists have often been baffled by the existence of spontaneous order in the universe. The laws of thermodynamics seem to dictate the opposite, that nature should inexorably degenerate toward a state of greater disorder, greater entropy. Yet all around us we see magnificent structures—galaxies, cells, ecosystems, human beings—that have all somehow managed to assemble themselves.” [14]


B  -  Arguments

A logical trend is taken in the argument for when/if any logical trend can be raised as to question and challenge.

First argument for consideration

The neighbour had a dish on his stove, inside his little room, since very early yesterday morning.

By the time night was about to start, I was still searching for a spot to stand or sit, where, I would be able to enjoy some sanity from his cooking  pot moist hot air that was by that time filling a radius around these two rooms that astonished me.
What I thought about the matter this morning, as I realized he is the primary source of the moist hot air.  So, if I am in my room, can I become :  say  :

if he is x spreading the moist hot air, can I be x+ n = y as such to be spreading moist hot air as a secondary(receiver) to be a secondary primary spreading the moist hot air that was spread.  And if possible, what would I be spreading?



Second Argument for consideration

I found an interesting example to comfort my logic when the  people around me, and on a certain radio station and a group related to this that has such access to computer matters, that I thought at one stage it may be a service provider, but the university involvement in this is now eminent, started accusing me of "I stole something from them or did something to them, so now they are victims to have to know every thought I think.

Well, I guess one cannot really just say, but that is a total irrational thought.  As why and how can I say so if so many are making such a claim?  So, I came across this video by Aerospace where the guy has a computer program that is able to give him access to a virtual reality where he makes a choice on what he looks like, what his girlfriend looks like and he can act out inside that virtual reality his exact feelings, and he is taking a motorbike ride with the girl in the virtual reality..  Then the song goes on.  At the end of the song, the video shows a women that also has access to that program, and she was able to be an observer of what the guy was doing.  The interesting part that caught my attention, was she was able to make her own free choices from where she sat with earphones and watching that specific program also.  This meant, she could also have chosen 3weeks to pass, before she would check that specific program, or she might have chosen to ignore it totally.


Third Argument for consideration

The next aspect related to this is the following:

Part 1
I have noticed by now, the neighbour, being very attentive to my each and every thought, learnt certain skills in the meantime. 
Now, he explicitly do not have my consent to have access to my thoughts, but since there has been accusations, even broadcasted on radio platform, (one guy was so upset with being labelled a stalker because he has obtained access to my thoughts) the matter didn't just blew over.  No formal charges was put in at authorities as I was never informed by any police officer of my rights as I was a suspect and I can get myself a lawyer for my defence.  Though with my financial troubles I experienced;  and laying eyes on a document that contains certain laws as to what or how may the economy deal with a terrorist, I might easily have qualified that I was treated as a terrorist.

OK, so, without my consent the neighbour has access to my thoughts.  And he developed skills that under any other normal, non criminal matter would not have been possible, from where he could harass my every move I make.

Part 2
I have also witnessed in this process, the birds and insects (nature) rush to the scene once it become clear he is using his skills to harm me.  They will chirp and chirp for as long as it takes as to give help.  The "straight hits" attempts, the impact can be less damaging.I am today, after a few days' exposure to severe harassments, only having three places inside that are painful.
I have seen with his capabilities that if I am painting a model in a certain app on the smartphone (now his buddies is at some centre from where they have quite a horrible access to my phone, my Facebook and the web);, it is possible for him to harass at a specific target.  At a certain part of his choice, I would miss to press the mouse button as to color or paint that specific part.  Yet, with the birds chirping and chirping(now remember the birds are all in their free state outside), the chirping can manage to prevent an action of miss painting, nearly halfway through.

Part 3
The next important part of the observation on the spiritual stealing of thoughts, the effects of it;
I have learnt by now, in reality, I have me ( I am a human being part of a society), then there is nature and then there is God's creation.  The creation aspect referring to the angelic realms as most religions would probably understand them.  The important aspect I noticed is the sense for righteous choices.  Now I refer to nature and God's creation.  The only place where one can expect anything else than this sense of righteous choices, will be from a person.  A human being and the difference is they can sometimes get a "straight hit" because they know exactly where you are sitting, what you are doing and what you are thinking and mostly what your reactions would be.  When they get angry, that is when the straight hits can occur.

Normally, when someone is just angry with you, the whole package of what that anger is all about is all that can get from one person to another.


The Logical Perspective that can be formed from the arguments 1 - 3


So, I am dealing with people and the way I am dealing with them is a very stressed system - there are many people involved and they acted criminally towards me and now it is a rundown to the report of the matter to the authorities while universities and police forces are also involved, in relation to one where people have no access to one anothers thoughts and inner being, or people I have consented to as to have access to my thoughts. In most cases this can be a spiritual healer -  but it is a normal environment.
A stressed system that relates closely to the 2nd Law of Thermodynamics.
Then it leaves me with the following :  The system involved in the 2nd Law of Thermodynamics where (within the 2nd Law of Thermodynamics and therefore Order, Disorder and Entropy) you can get a stressed situation that are constantly stressed as people fear their crimes be exposed and they will get criminally charged, that seems to be heading endlessly to a maximum stressed situation as the people involved are in such relations to society that makes it nearly impossible to report the matter.
This is my observation in my experiences with the two type of people in my life.  The one part of people are criminally harassing me with the stealing of my thoughts.
The others, my family and people I used to know, they are a different system as their relationships with me can never reach the same levels.
The neighbour is cool and calm centered to get me to obey(which is in no way possible as he knows every thought I take) and if not, pay a penalty as like in the days when slaves didn't listen to their master.  Going from the point of view, until I can proof them guilty, until then their point of view is the going one for them.  I was the one who "naaied" all of them.  This means, the matter must go to a court and all these trespassers charged criminally, in which I also face a setback(?)  of claiming fame to my own life's existence. Ok, the last part  is actually besides the point but worth to mention.
The logical perspective that can be concluded therefore  :    there are two systems - my notion being the one system can only reach as much as an emotional outburst, the other one has the stressed situation that relates to the stressed situation in the 2nd Law of Thermodynamics on Entropy and Order and Disorder.
If this is so, then we have a system : the system with 2nd Law  appearing in ;  and this system isn't only a random system.  The other system though can be considered as a totally random system with no forced and manipulated states that developed, like one thing lead to the next, type of effect.

The question will be, but can't the one system K (related to order and disorder and entropy) go over to the other L?   I give an answer as to the following aspect : if system K give properties to system L, the properties handed over, or that become part of system L will be random only like L was random initially.


Ns :  Important is the motives for the groups existence, their involvement (some of their members at universities) gave rise to experimentation and which was subject to involve to seek a form of control over nature.  This lead to nature assisting me with mostly psychological help as I became a third person or a medium for this group to blackmail and challenge nature and God's creation.  This mean, I cannot know if in every situation like this one, will nature rush to help when someone is  getting harassed.