The problem with the gay science kind, is not that they are gays, but evil gets no place of existence. Accordingly, everything is correct. The true version to this is also then, everything is incorrect.
You will still be sitting with a (+) outcome.
The problem though is that this (+) outcome is not the highest value of this system. Another particular interfere.
The gay sciencers and followers turn their reality to the one where the outcomes are based on (+) times (+) equal (-) now and (-) times (-) equal (-) and (+) times (-) equal (+). Where within the logical mathematical sets, these three positions (+) times (+) and (-) times (-) and (+) times (-), are just the other way around.
The mathematical logical equation relations one will see, are all based on the positions where the gay science followers effects are not. The gay science follower effect and it's (+) times (+) value ( and so also then the (+) times (-) and (-) times (-)) is the true unlogical, unmathematical position and in reality, anarchy.
Anarchy is where there is a law for today, but tomorrow that same law(criteria for the law) were challenged and are valueless for this new tomorrow where yesterday's law is of no value as it proved pointless and invalueble. Laws that can stand over a period of longer than one day therefore and have longstanding value, are the real challenge and aim in life. To find them. They do exist. Like old fashioned mathematics rules, they do exist. The basics of them giving the society optimal protection. Fighting isn't always an optimal way of protection. Laws therefore bring those type of protection for the individual to feel safe within his society.
And this (+) times (+) positions in mathematics, bring the gay science effect in a more mathematical way to the scenes of understanding the gay science territory. It isn't quite related to gay people. It is about a science of viewing our reality where everything is accepted as being correct. Like with the Afrikaner racists for years, the notion that they never sinned with apartheid, it was only part of their Devine missions. If there ain't any wrong doing ever, then where do you draw the line? If a sin like apartheid is accepted that no Afrikaner ever sinned and that they should therefore persist to pursue such a state of government, how and where will they draw the line on what is wrong and what is right, draw the lines on morality?
No comments:
Post a Comment