There is one criteria that transformation can be measured on to clarify if it is successfully dealt with and over or not.
If I go to a university in SA, and I find any traces that colonialism is to be blamed for apartheid, then the transformation process is far from reaching any optimal levels in SA society. This point of view, that colonialism had as a natural next step in its evolution, apartheid in SA, is still hovering as result of a unresolved transformation process for the new SA democracy. Once this stupid stance on history is cleared in more rational and intellectual ways, can SA begin to take considerations that maybe transformation has taken place successfully and its main aims have been achieved optimally.
In no way, can a group of economists, and Afrikaner orientated, go and declare transformation over and unconstitutional because BBBEE is unconstitutionally found by the constitutional court with regards to public procurement.
I question this group's intellectual approach to such a crucial dilemma, especially with YouTube footage produced in the months before they went to court on BBBEE unconstitutionality, where white people are shown living in squater conditions. So, now this Afrikaner group got BBBEE declared unconstitutional, and if anyone in a RDP house feel but, transformation is far from over, yet declared over and settled, but many will sit with the stigma of being the previous disadvantaged, staying in RDP houses, Basta. With possibilities they got their house because journalists blamed some people that tried to get out of being previous disadvantaged, for going on a holiday, instead of building RDP houses. So your RDP house was built by another previously disadvantaged not allowed by journalists to even have a holiday. What an insult to injuries suffered from apartheid disadvantages? And clever as only they can get, this blatant Afrikaners, will call transformation over by declaring it unconstitutional in the same breath as BBBEE. And don't consider to make a noise over your label staying in a RDP house, they might find it suitable to answer you as to why don't you then go and join their Afrikaner group living like squaters as a solution for your problem having a label of living in a RDP house which declare how many ANC politicians went without holidays. And with this in essence, the universities can still not really produce evidence that they challenged the view that apartheid was a natural event that filled a spot in history. Again, a very shrewd Afrikaner mentality to be noticed from all this Go stay in your RDP house, sinner that was a victim of apartheid! And if you are not happy, the white boss can offer you to go and stay with the white squater group he established to keep everyone's mouths shut. This is the reason, why the universities cannot afford to go on declaring apartheid was a natural selection occasion in history. It was blatantly cruel and in no way would support the principles of Christianity which this Afrikaner people based their lives upon. They were busy with a heresy, and if they think that this was something God ordered, they are wrong. No judge have the authority to declare an accused criminal not guilty on a crime when all the evidence produced by the prosecutor and the defence, indicate the criminal committed the offence, but because the judge feel this man's background and history exceeds all this evidence produced as this man went to church on Sundays twice, he surely deserves to receive a not guilty from the judge.
To me, I think in the years Calvyn started out, this surely could still have been a dilemma, to get it under the attention of the majority of society, that all criminals are not necessarily sinners, but they most definitely are criminals and that the justice system of society over crimes are not playing God over sinners. The justice system of a society is promoting harmony in a society based on principles not supporting anarchy.
Protest actions are just means to handle your problems. Especially, like I know SA have it at the moment, it is done legally, if no consent was received before the protest march, and the police informed on the matter, then it is considered that is an illegal protest.
The reason why I mention protest actions(march) and justice procedures, as being non anarchistic methods of society, is because apartheid and discrimination is one of the most anarchistic state governings you will ever find. A bunch of Christians challenging Christianity all across the world as to who is who in the zoo. The Afrikaners and their seperate development apartheid regime, or the rest of the Christians in the outside world who would think it a sin to just kick off the land millions of people and their lives in the name of Christianity? And please, I am using figurative speech when saying or asking who is who in the zoo!
This was no innocent move this group pulled on Christianity. You cannot try and be God and say, ok, but they lived good lives and went to church, so let's not get too much onto the case of apartheid and declare it as a natural thing, or a next step that was suppose to happen in history that actually rid it of its wrongness and heresy character. Their going to church have got nothing to do with the case presented that apartheid was a heresy and a big crime against humanity. Though their churches were by World Council of churches in 1982 Ottawa, repremanded and SA got the 1994 new constitution. Further, the churches did take the action to state in their rules that they will abide by the laws of the new SA constitution and they did declare that apartheid was wrong. I specifically wrote a letter to get clarity on this matter to the Afrikaner churches. They did accept the notion that apartheid was wrong as part of their culture and rules after 1994.
The matter of declaring BB-BEE unconstitutional wasn't done with much thought put into the matter, instead, it looks like there was a hurry of a kind to also in silence get transformation declared unconstitutional in the process by degrading the transformation process to the criteria that it can be measured by BBBEE as no evidence or studies were even taken to consider what the current position of transformation is in SA currently and produced to support the call that BBBEE is unconstitutional. Just, BBBEE is unconstitutional. And there goes our whole transformation project for new SA also because of a lack of insight by this Afrikaner economist group to get BB-BEE just quickly, quickly out of their way before too many questions gets asked. Now everything is back to normal again according to this racist group and they can breathe again and be the boss and everything is back to normal, or shall I say, it is much more like back before 1994, just this time, they can say they complied to form a new democracy. But they are now back at to being the boss again. The big white boss, with such a lack of skilled intellectual approaches to his moves he pull. And under the new constitution, the new constitution will challenge this lack of intellectual insight in a matter. Which mean, millions of Christians abroad haven't been wrong during all those apartheid years and Afrikaners right. The lives of millions of innocent people is still, a basic treasure for a normal Christian over and above to play boss over others where those that are this bossy, for them slavery in its cruelest forms as a crime against humanity, is still a good option for consideration.
No comments:
Post a Comment